Article Analysis Essay Example for Free

Article Analysis EssayWrite a short, clear summary of the articleThe article argues that the West should apply economical sanctions coupled with shelter pressure in order to prevent Iran from further development of its nuclear program. The author believes that sanctions would hunt better than incentives through not providing rewards for inappropriate behavior. The author concludes that, in case sanctions fail, preemptive strike is not the best solution, but it is more preferable to the situation in which Iran acquires nuclear weapons.What is the context of the article?The article, create in winter 2007 provide of Middle East Quarterly, appeared in the midst of the heated debate on the possible measures used to prevent Iran from developing its nuclear program. At that time, several approaches were on the table (e.g. American, European, and Russian suggestions), and an unbiased analysis of the projected effectiveness of each approach was highly needed.What seems to be the aut hors role?The authors affair is to present his stead on the situation in Iran and explicate the rationale behind the beliefs he holds concerning this matter. He also aims to bias audience of the necessity to adopt the suggested approach.In what type of publication did this appear? Describe it.The article appeared in Middle East Quarterly. It is quarterly journal consecrate on Middle eastern affairs. The publication has been referred to as a useful resource of information on political, economic, and cultural developments in the region for politicians, academics, and journalists. Main types of articles published there include in-depth studies, interviews, commentary, and reviews.Write a brief analysis of the authors credentials and possible expertise or bias. If no information is in stock(predicate) on the author, try to take a guess based upon his or her noesis and writing ability, which you faculty derive from the article.The author of the article is Patrick Clawson, senior editor of the Middle East Quarterly, is director for research at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. He is a well-established expert on Middle Eastern affairs and the author of more than seventy articles about regional affairs that appeared in reputable publications like New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post. Persian nuclear program has been his focus for several years already one of his books is titled Getting Ready for a Nuclear Ready Iran.Who seems to be the tooshie audience? Be specific.The target audience of this article encompasses members of public-at-large interested in world politics and Middle Easters affairs. This publication is not intended for professionals dealing with the issue of Iran or academics it does not operate terminology or data that needs particular expertise in international relations. However, the article presumes that the potential reader is sensitive of the development of the situation in Iran since it refers to certain well-known facts and opinion concerning the problem. The author also assumes that the target audience has sufficient education level and enough knowledge of international affairs to be able to grasp certain historical examples or evaluate data supplied by international organizations.In short abridgment form, show the authors stance. Then, explain and evaluate the presentation of the authors stance. In other words, whats the thesis? What reasons are given for this stance? Are the reasons supported well? The author argues that the West should opt for exerting economic pressure on Iran. He argues that the country is dependant on international economic transactions in securing its well-being. The author suggests a list of measures that might be effective in dealing with Iran, such as harshening restrictions concerning financial operations and trade, pressuring charities that work closely with Iranian leaders, discouraging the investment in Irans oil and gas industry, decreasing the pr esence of international firms and financial institutions in the country. These sanctions will be effective since the primary concern of Iranian government now is delivering its promises in terms of raising quality of life and well-being of the nations.However, economic sanctions are not enough and should be coupled with security department inducement through showing how a decision to denounce the nuclear program might contribute to the viability of the country.In the concluding section, he argues that using preemptive military force is not the best option. Explanation for that is found earlier in the text attack on Iran can be used to rekindle the lost fervor of revolutionary days.Analyze the writers language. What is the writers tone? Why might he or she have chosen this tone? Is it effective? What words are defined or left undefined? Give examples.Writers language and tone are both effective if we keep target audience in mind. The language of the article is easily accessible yet very official. Some rhetorical devices (i.e. rhetorical questions) are used to reinforce writers thesis. However, the article relies on logical rather than emotional appeal.As for the terms, security inducements referred to in the last chapter before the conclusion are loosely defined, especially as compared with economic sanctions which are listed and discussed in detail.Based upon your analysis, is this a credible effect of writing? Explain.It is possible to conclude that the article is a credible piece of writing. Lacking in-depth analysis or innovative approach, it provides a comprehensive summary of main telephone lines on the issues and has no factual mistakes.Finally, and in detail (really think about thisrefer to specifics) how do the stance and language choices relate to the authors purpose and target audience? Explain.Since the article is a persuasive essay, the author explains his argument carefully and consistently. Taking into account that the target audience consis ts of members of public-at-large rather than academics, every argument is backed by accessible analysis and abundant factual data (such as figures, quotations, and historical examples). Since the educational level of target audience is high, the author keeps at heart the limits of official and quasiscientific style of writing.